<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mortgage Insurance Update &#8211; Speculators May Now Control Purchase Market</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mrmortgage.ml-implode.com/2008/08/31/mortgage-insurance-update-speculators-now-control-purchase-market/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mrmortgage.ml-implode.com/2008/08/31/mortgage-insurance-update-speculators-now-control-purchase-market/</link>
	<description>Your personal tour guide through the housing finance "misinformation maze".</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 13:28:04 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: BH</title>
		<link>http://mrmortgage.ml-implode.com/2008/08/31/mortgage-insurance-update-speculators-now-control-purchase-market/comment-page-1/#comment-5199</link>
		<dc:creator>BH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 14:35:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mrmortgage.ml-implode.com/?p=270#comment-5199</guid>
		<description>Call me what you want but I&#039;m buying 3/2 1000-1500 sq. foot homes right smack dab in So Cal for well under 100k.  These homes currently rent for 1300-1400.  Currently my average purchase price is 92k which is well below what the people paid when there were new in the 80&#039;s.  

Houses will never be free, the rents are well in line with incomes, and these cash flow like stuck pigs.  Speculators, knife catchers whatever, all you &quot;smart&quot; guys said the same stuff during the 90&#039;s.  Meanwhile, those with the balls to take action made millions and we are going to do it again.

It is easy to throw a once size fits all blanket over the entire market but when you (to use your words) really look at the micro aspect of the markets you find pockets of gold.  Pockets where the buying activity by owner users is very robust, where there is ample employment and solid rental demand.  Pockets where a well priced home receive multiple offers and sell for over asking.  Pockets where the bulk of sales are to owner users.  But then again, you have your own blog so that means you know much more then us ole knife catchin speculators.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Call me what you want but I&#8217;m buying 3/2 1000-1500 sq. foot homes right smack dab in So Cal for well under 100k.  These homes currently rent for 1300-1400.  Currently my average purchase price is 92k which is well below what the people paid when there were new in the 80&#8217;s.  </p>
<p>Houses will never be free, the rents are well in line with incomes, and these cash flow like stuck pigs.  Speculators, knife catchers whatever, all you &#8220;smart&#8221; guys said the same stuff during the 90&#8217;s.  Meanwhile, those with the balls to take action made millions and we are going to do it again.</p>
<p>It is easy to throw a once size fits all blanket over the entire market but when you (to use your words) really look at the micro aspect of the markets you find pockets of gold.  Pockets where the buying activity by owner users is very robust, where there is ample employment and solid rental demand.  Pockets where a well priced home receive multiple offers and sell for over asking.  Pockets where the bulk of sales are to owner users.  But then again, you have your own blog so that means you know much more then us ole knife catchin speculators.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Lawler</title>
		<link>http://mrmortgage.ml-implode.com/2008/08/31/mortgage-insurance-update-speculators-now-control-purchase-market/comment-page-1/#comment-5193</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Lawler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 12:04:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mrmortgage.ml-implode.com/?p=270#comment-5193</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t forgot the FHA.  In July, there were 7,719 mortgage purchase loans endorsed by FHA.  In July of last year, there were only 354 mortgage purchase loans endorsed by FHA.  Endorsements lag closings by an average of about 5 weeks, so for the most part July&#039;s endorsements reflect June&#039;s purchase activity.  

Needless to say, the increase in FHA purchase loan activity this year is startling, and at least in part reflects an increase in first-time home buyer activity fueled by the plunge in home prices.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t forgot the FHA.  In July, there were 7,719 mortgage purchase loans endorsed by FHA.  In July of last year, there were only 354 mortgage purchase loans endorsed by FHA.  Endorsements lag closings by an average of about 5 weeks, so for the most part July&#8217;s endorsements reflect June&#8217;s purchase activity.  </p>
<p>Needless to say, the increase in FHA purchase loan activity this year is startling, and at least in part reflects an increase in first-time home buyer activity fueled by the plunge in home prices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fedwatcher</title>
		<link>http://mrmortgage.ml-implode.com/2008/08/31/mortgage-insurance-update-speculators-now-control-purchase-market/comment-page-1/#comment-5187</link>
		<dc:creator>fedwatcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 05:40:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mrmortgage.ml-implode.com/?p=270#comment-5187</guid>
		<description>I agree with those who say it is too early to buy.

I may buy in the spring of 2009, if I find a place meeting my strict criteria.
-	less than $100.00 per square foot
-	8% return on net purchase price via rent, allowing a 10% vacancy
-	less than 5 miles from major employers
-	a walk ability score greater than 50%
-	etc., etc., etc.

However, new data can alter my plan. The main reason for my looking at real estate as an investment to generate cash income and not as a speculation to flip, is that it can function as an inflation hedge as well. In a long term deflationary environment, I would lower rents but maintain purchasing power. In a long term inflationary environment, I would raise rents to maintain purchasing power. In all cases ‘affordability’ is key. That is affordable house prices and rents. I want mortgage underwriting rules to be like they were in 1976, not like they were in 2006. Gold does not pay interest, T-bills do and rental properties also. I see inflation followed by deflation followed by inflation. We are at the cusp of the shift from inflation to deflation. But for Real Estate, it is deflation in all classes except for agriculture where prices are continuing to rise.

Why don’t you look at apartment buildings?

The problem with apartment buildings is that the current holders expect to continue to raise rents and thus expect a price for their property than is unrealistic. In the future, things will get a lot worse for landlords in general as more communities enact rent-control, it becomes harder to evict, and as the financial condition of ones tenants deteriorates.

I do not and will not become a slumlord. I want to be able to look my renter in the eye knowing that I am charging an affordable fair rent and that my renter gains economic advantage by renting from me as to location, price, and amenities.

The ‘greed is good’ message of Wall Street has put us at risk of a major class war. We have allowed Wall Street to sell their BS to the world.

DEBT is the main problem. Financial engineering, Easy Al, Hank, Ben, and a long string of U.S. Presidents both Democrat and Republican have led us here (the ordering of Democrat before Republican is both alphabetic and that the fudging of our economic numbers started with JFK and continued through each succeeding administration). Thus we now have two ‘Change’ candidates for the title of POTUS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with those who say it is too early to buy.</p>
<p>I may buy in the spring of 2009, if I find a place meeting my strict criteria.<br />
-	less than $100.00 per square foot<br />
-	8% return on net purchase price via rent, allowing a 10% vacancy<br />
-	less than 5 miles from major employers<br />
-	a walk ability score greater than 50%<br />
-	etc., etc., etc.</p>
<p>However, new data can alter my plan. The main reason for my looking at real estate as an investment to generate cash income and not as a speculation to flip, is that it can function as an inflation hedge as well. In a long term deflationary environment, I would lower rents but maintain purchasing power. In a long term inflationary environment, I would raise rents to maintain purchasing power. In all cases ‘affordability’ is key. That is affordable house prices and rents. I want mortgage underwriting rules to be like they were in 1976, not like they were in 2006. Gold does not pay interest, T-bills do and rental properties also. I see inflation followed by deflation followed by inflation. We are at the cusp of the shift from inflation to deflation. But for Real Estate, it is deflation in all classes except for agriculture where prices are continuing to rise.</p>
<p>Why don’t you look at apartment buildings?</p>
<p>The problem with apartment buildings is that the current holders expect to continue to raise rents and thus expect a price for their property than is unrealistic. In the future, things will get a lot worse for landlords in general as more communities enact rent-control, it becomes harder to evict, and as the financial condition of ones tenants deteriorates.</p>
<p>I do not and will not become a slumlord. I want to be able to look my renter in the eye knowing that I am charging an affordable fair rent and that my renter gains economic advantage by renting from me as to location, price, and amenities.</p>
<p>The ‘greed is good’ message of Wall Street has put us at risk of a major class war. We have allowed Wall Street to sell their BS to the world.</p>
<p>DEBT is the main problem. Financial engineering, Easy Al, Hank, Ben, and a long string of U.S. Presidents both Democrat and Republican have led us here (the ordering of Democrat before Republican is both alphabetic and that the fudging of our economic numbers started with JFK and continued through each succeeding administration). Thus we now have two ‘Change’ candidates for the title of POTUS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CaptiousNut</title>
		<link>http://mrmortgage.ml-implode.com/2008/08/31/mortgage-insurance-update-speculators-now-control-purchase-market/comment-page-1/#comment-5181</link>
		<dc:creator>CaptiousNut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 02:57:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mrmortgage.ml-implode.com/?p=270#comment-5181</guid>
		<description>An *all cash* guy bought a &lt;a href=&quot;http://marginalizingmorons.blogspot.com/2008/07/marginalizing-speculator.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;beachfront house&lt;/a&gt; near me in Boston just last month .  He did *work* as fast as he could and is already down to near breakeven on his offering price.  He risked 750k for what would be, at best, a 29k profit - today anyway.  Rental value of house is probably less than 2/3 of the carrying cost (and of course that is assuming today&#039;s *low i-rates*).

As I put it, the FIRST falling knife is the most dangerous one to try and catch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An *all cash* guy bought a <a href="http://marginalizingmorons.blogspot.com/2008/07/marginalizing-speculator.html" rel="nofollow">beachfront house</a> near me in Boston just last month .  He did *work* as fast as he could and is already down to near breakeven on his offering price.  He risked 750k for what would be, at best, a 29k profit &#8211; today anyway.  Rental value of house is probably less than 2/3 of the carrying cost (and of course that is assuming today&#8217;s *low i-rates*).</p>
<p>As I put it, the FIRST falling knife is the most dangerous one to try and catch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peterb</title>
		<link>http://mrmortgage.ml-implode.com/2008/08/31/mortgage-insurance-update-speculators-now-control-purchase-market/comment-page-1/#comment-5157</link>
		<dc:creator>peterb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 17:09:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mrmortgage.ml-implode.com/?p=270#comment-5157</guid>
		<description>Yes, I was thinking CA when I said systemic instability, not USA. Bad habit. Big state. I would echo Brant&#039;s advice about waiting this one out. There seems to be all kinds of pain headed for this market. I cant see any encouraging news on the horizon for CA real estate. Unemployment increasing, credit constricting, defaults rising. Defaults in San Diego county are starting to average 1900/month. Astounding figure! Old record was 1996 at 600/month.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I was thinking CA when I said systemic instability, not USA. Bad habit. Big state. I would echo Brant&#8217;s advice about waiting this one out. There seems to be all kinds of pain headed for this market. I cant see any encouraging news on the horizon for CA real estate. Unemployment increasing, credit constricting, defaults rising. Defaults in San Diego county are starting to average 1900/month. Astounding figure! Old record was 1996 at 600/month.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brant Gaede</title>
		<link>http://mrmortgage.ml-implode.com/2008/08/31/mortgage-insurance-update-speculators-now-control-purchase-market/comment-page-1/#comment-5154</link>
		<dc:creator>Brant Gaede</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 15:57:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mrmortgage.ml-implode.com/?p=270#comment-5154</guid>
		<description>fedwatcher, be patient. The numbers may look good today and horrible a year from now. All cash? You are giving up interest tax deductions, no? You can finance and backstop that by putting the left over cash in T-bills. Also, be sure to incorporate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fedwatcher, be patient. The numbers may look good today and horrible a year from now. All cash? You are giving up interest tax deductions, no? You can finance and backstop that by putting the left over cash in T-bills. Also, be sure to incorporate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G Cox</title>
		<link>http://mrmortgage.ml-implode.com/2008/08/31/mortgage-insurance-update-speculators-now-control-purchase-market/comment-page-1/#comment-5137</link>
		<dc:creator>G Cox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 06:28:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mrmortgage.ml-implode.com/?p=270#comment-5137</guid>
		<description>PeterB, that negative equity is the driver should be taken as read and was apparent a year ago where there had been a boom and where the loans are non-recourse.
 The key question is whether the landlord demand as described above can absorb the flood of foreclosures and whether the prices at which foreclosures are selling at now in the worst areas as REOs is approaching the affordability level for all those renters who have been waiting for years .

One thing is certain. There is no national real estate market and analysis should build up from  regional market   forecasts. For example  Texas is on another planet from Calfornia/Arizona.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PeterB, that negative equity is the driver should be taken as read and was apparent a year ago where there had been a boom and where the loans are non-recourse.<br />
 The key question is whether the landlord demand as described above can absorb the flood of foreclosures and whether the prices at which foreclosures are selling at now in the worst areas as REOs is approaching the affordability level for all those renters who have been waiting for years .</p>
<p>One thing is certain. There is no national real estate market and analysis should build up from  regional market   forecasts. For example  Texas is on another planet from Calfornia/Arizona.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fedwatcher</title>
		<link>http://mrmortgage.ml-implode.com/2008/08/31/mortgage-insurance-update-speculators-now-control-purchase-market/comment-page-1/#comment-5136</link>
		<dc:creator>fedwatcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 04:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mrmortgage.ml-implode.com/?p=270#comment-5136</guid>
		<description>I myself am considering buying 3 to 5 houses for all cash to provide a retirement income stream.

However, I need these to be at levels that yield 8% after ALL COSTS assuming a 10% vacancy factor. I think that in some markets these conditions exist, but my guess is that some people are jumping in early.

Expected rental income is the key, however some ‘flippers’ are there believing that the bottom will be in Q3 2009 as per Jim ‘there is always a bull market somewhere’ Cramer..

Demographics (the aging boomer population, new households with debt but no savings, overbuilding in long commute areas, people doubling up, etc., etc.) suggest that ‘The Bottom’ may well not arrive until 2012 or even latter.

In such a market, if you can get the right rent, and do not need to sell, purchasing can make sense. But if you need a rising sales price or ‘equity’, forget it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I myself am considering buying 3 to 5 houses for all cash to provide a retirement income stream.</p>
<p>However, I need these to be at levels that yield 8% after ALL COSTS assuming a 10% vacancy factor. I think that in some markets these conditions exist, but my guess is that some people are jumping in early.</p>
<p>Expected rental income is the key, however some ‘flippers’ are there believing that the bottom will be in Q3 2009 as per Jim ‘there is always a bull market somewhere’ Cramer..</p>
<p>Demographics (the aging boomer population, new households with debt but no savings, overbuilding in long commute areas, people doubling up, etc., etc.) suggest that ‘The Bottom’ may well not arrive until 2012 or even latter.</p>
<p>In such a market, if you can get the right rent, and do not need to sell, purchasing can make sense. But if you need a rising sales price or ‘equity’, forget it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peterb</title>
		<link>http://mrmortgage.ml-implode.com/2008/08/31/mortgage-insurance-update-speculators-now-control-purchase-market/comment-page-1/#comment-5135</link>
		<dc:creator>peterb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 03:21:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mrmortgage.ml-implode.com/?p=270#comment-5135</guid>
		<description>It was interesting to read the Boston Fed report on negative equity as the biggest factor in loan defaults. Makes the whole system seem just that much more unstable since you could still be fully employed and making money and still default as a financial decision! And this may involve almost all buyers from 2005 onward.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was interesting to read the Boston Fed report on negative equity as the biggest factor in loan defaults. Makes the whole system seem just that much more unstable since you could still be fully employed and making money and still default as a financial decision! And this may involve almost all buyers from 2005 onward.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dr</title>
		<link>http://mrmortgage.ml-implode.com/2008/08/31/mortgage-insurance-update-speculators-now-control-purchase-market/comment-page-1/#comment-5134</link>
		<dc:creator>dr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 03:14:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mrmortgage.ml-implode.com/?p=270#comment-5134</guid>
		<description>Hey Tom,


Are you talking about my loan??  I am north bay. I am down 250k and out of money and work. D_O_O_M_E_D is me. I agree 50% is right on the money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Tom,</p>
<p>Are you talking about my loan??  I am north bay. I am down 250k and out of money and work. D_O_O_M_E_D is me. I agree 50% is right on the money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
